Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 4d7071fa authored by Ingo Friese's avatar Ingo Friese
Browse files

Model Mapping Text

parent eb83141c
No related branches found
No related tags found
2 merge requests!7Sds 2024 0117 ogc to one m2 m data model mapping,!6SDS-2024-0064R02-architecture_model
This commit is part of merge request !7. Comments created here will be created in the context of that merge request.
......@@ -182,12 +182,21 @@ Figure 6.0-1 shows an architecture approach for an Interworking Proxy Entity (IP
The basic interworking enables applications that are connected to an oneM2M-based system to get data from sensors that are connected to an OGC/STA server. Furthermore, an application that is connected to an OGC/STA server will be able to get data from sensors that are connected to an oneM2M-based system.
<figure>
<img src="media/figure6_0__1.png" alt="arch_overview">
<figcaption>Figure 6.0-1: IPE architecture overview with data flow</figcaption>
</figure>
## 6.1 OGC/STA-to-oneM2M Data Model Mapping
According to oneM2M TS-0033 [i.4] a representation of a non-oneM2M Proximal IoT function/device in a oneM2M-specified resource instance is to be synchronized with the entity that it represents.
This means that the OGC/STA data model is represented in the hosting CSE. The data in the OGC/STA server are organized as Sensing Entities [i.3] (see Figure 5.1-1: STA Sensing Entities data model).
The oneM2M structure for data models is a tree-structure where data are organized in containers or trees of containers.
The OGC/STA data model is a relational one, as used in databases, and not hierarchical. Thus, it creates a challenge for full interworking of all data captured in the OGC/STA data model.
<mark>The following text is to be used when appropriate:</mark>
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment